Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267132AbTA0Fnp>; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:43:45 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267133AbTA0Fnp>; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:43:45 -0500
Received: from kunde0416.oslo-asen.alfanett.no ([62.249.189.163]:54029 "EHLO
	kunde0416.oslo-asen.alfanett.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267132AbTA0Fnp>; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:43:45 -0500
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 06:52:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.20 kernel crashes while scanning partition list
In-Reply-To: <20030126211810.GB696@louise.pinerecords.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0301270650470.3402-100000@perkele>
X-Warning: Junk / bulk email will be reported
X-Rating: This message is not to be eaten by humans
Organization: /universe/earth/europe/norway/oslo
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Tomas Szepe:

> I have yet to hear about a scenario where Linux raid performs poorly.
> What exactly did these people mean who told you md weren't reliable?

The problem was not performance, according to what I read, the problem
was in handling when harddisks fail and such. And since I want to use
raid to improve security (by using mirroring), not performance, that's
quite important.

-- 
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

  I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/