Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754282AbbFCNmb (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 09:42:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:38154 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754050AbbFCNmR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 09:42:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:42:10 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Support Opensource , Jingoo Han , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Sascha Hauer , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] video: fbdev: imxfb: Constify platform_device_id Message-ID: <20150603134210.GC12304@x1> References: <1430494721-30793-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com> <1430494721-30793-2-git-send-email-k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com> <20150505082807.GV4047@x1> <556EE743.5030405@ti.com> <20150603115050.GB12304@x1> <556EEABD.6020902@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <556EEABD.6020902@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1440 Lines: 45 On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 03/06/15 14:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > >> Hi Lee, > >> > >> On 05/05/15 11:28, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> On Sat, 02 May 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> > >>>> The platform_device_id is not modified by the driver and core uses it as > >>>> const. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/video/fbdev/imxfb.c | 2 +- > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> Applied, thanks. > >> > >> You applied the fbdev changes in this series also, not only the > >> backlight changes? > > > > Ah, yes I did. I assumed they were all due for Backlight. > > > > Would you like me to un-apply the non-Backlight patches? > > If you can easily remove them, yes. > > But chances for conflict are quite minimal, so if you already have a > pile of commits on top of these, it's fine if they go via backlight tree. I can easily remove them, no problem. Consider them unapplied. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/