Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758544AbbFCQnv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:43:51 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:12448 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758473AbbFCQnk (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:43:40 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,547,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="581460343" Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:43:34 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, safford@us.ibm.com, Marcel Selhorst , "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" , open list , richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: introduce struct tpm_buf Message-ID: <20150603164334.GA2327@jsakkine-mobl1> References: <1433250262-17200-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20150602181315.GE17776@obsidianresearch.com> <20150603122331.GA3542@jsakkine-mobl1> <20150603161128.GB12073@obsidianresearch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150603161128.GB12073@obsidianresearch.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2175 Lines: 55 On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:11:28AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:23:31PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:13:15PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 04:04:22PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > +/* A string buffer type for constructing TPM commands. This is based on the > > > > + * code in security/keys/trusted.h. > > > > + */ > > > > + > > > > +#define TPM_BUF_SIZE 512 > > > > + > > > > +struct tpm_buf { > > > > + u8 data[TPM_BUF_SIZE]; > > > This should be u32 or u64 to guarentee correct alignment for the > > > casting. > > > > Good catch. The functions where this might cause trouble are *_length() > > and *_tag(). > > > > In other places misalignment should not cause any regressions since data > > is not directly assigned to the buffer with pointer casting. > > > > I would prefer to fix by changing *_length() and *_tag() to copy the > > value to a local variable and return that. It's a fail safe way and here > > the performance is not an issue. > > I would change the type, that is very simple and will improve > performance of the memcpy as well. > > It actually isn't a problem for the casts to tpm_input_header - any > structure marked __packed will cause the compiler to assume that the > entire structure is unaligned and code gen accordingly, so the cast > will always work, but on x86 it will be more efficient if the array > is aligned. > > Ideally we could change to something like: > __attribute__((packed,aligned(4))) > > Instead of __packed which will help the compiler minimize unaligned > load instructions.. I realized basically the same what you said here when I refined the patch (read this email after sending v2) :) I decided that align to 8 bytes. I don't think the packed attribute is needed here because now I cast the beginning to tpm_input_header, which is a packed struct. > Jason /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/