Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:17:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:17:05 -0500 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:11980 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:17:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:25:53 -0600 (CST) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: David Woodhouse cc: Christian Zander , Mark Fasheh , Thomas Schlichter , "Randy.Dunlap" , Sam Ravnborg , LKML , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: no version magic, tainting kernel. In-Reply-To: <31172.1043622971@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, David Woodhouse wrote: > For older kernels you must set O_TARGET, for 2.5 I think the mere act of > setting it causes the build to break -- that one is gratuitously making it > harder to make external modules which compile in both and I've complained > about it before. Okay, I might get persuaded to take that check out if it really makes life harder. Wouldn't it work to not have O_TARGET in the Makefile at all, I think 2.4 shouldn't care as long as you just "make modules"? > Per-file CFLAGS must have a full path specified now in 2.5, whereas in 2.4 > and earlier it was just 'CFLAGS_filename.o'. It shouldn't, I kinda deliberately decided to keep the old syntax for this. So it would be a bug. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/