Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:27:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:27:48 -0500 Received: from [213.86.99.237] ([213.86.99.237]:26090 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:27:48 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: References: To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: Christian Zander , Mark Fasheh , Thomas Schlichter , "Randy.Dunlap" , Sam Ravnborg , LKML , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: no version magic, tainting kernel. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:29:23 +0000 Message-ID: <8626.1043684963@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de said: > Okay, I might get persuaded to take that check out if it really makes > life harder. Wouldn't it work to not have O_TARGET in the Makefile at > all, I think 2.4 shouldn't care as long as you just "make modules"? Er, I think O_TARGET is in fact the target _module_ name when building a file system as a module. Try removing O_TARGET from 2.4 fs/ext2/Makefile and building ext2 as a module. > It shouldn't, I kinda deliberately decided to keep the old syntax for > this. So it would be a bug. Ah, OK -- sorry. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/