Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753559AbbFCXWW (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:22:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:33553 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751885AbbFCXWP (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:22:15 -0400 Message-ID: <556F8C1D.9050906@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:22:05 +0900 From: Kukjin Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kukjin Kim CC: Viresh Kumar , Lukasz Majewski , Kukjin Kim , Mike Turquette , Heiko Stuebner , Kevin Hilman , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , Thomas Abraham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sylwester Nawrocki , Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers forExynos4210platform References: <'@samsung.com> <1428079429-4252-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <2036292.PZC6aPyUyX@amdc1976> <55541F92.4020404@kernel.org> <20150514051046.GB9887@linux> <55549E03.6040105@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <55549E03.6040105@kernel.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2317 Lines: 60 On 05/14/15 22:07, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 05/14/15 14:10, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 14-05-15, 13:07, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> On 05/13/15 23:08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>> Hi Bart, >>> >>>> On Friday, April 03, 2015 06:43:43 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 specific support >>>>> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver >>>>> for this platform. >>>> >>>> Gentle Ping. Mike/Kukjin/Viresh could you please review/ack relevant >>>> patches (patches #1-3 are for clock subsystem, patches #4-5 for Exynos >>>> mach/dts and patch #6 is for cpufreq subsystem)? >> >> Sorry I thought I already Acked an older version of this set and so >> didn't went for it again. Done now. >> >>> Yes, I totally agreed with this patches for arch side changes and this >>> approach when Thomas posted. >>> >>>> Also what is your >>>> preferred way to upstream them (patches are not independent so it would >>>> be best to merge them through one tree, otherwise synchronization of >>>> git pulls between different subsystem trees will be needed)? >>>> >>> I can provide topic branch for arch side changes even it is small. I >>> think once Viresh and Mike make each topic branch based on -rc or the >>> smallest changes from each subsystem then I could handle this series or >>> Viresh or Mike need to handle this series with merging each topic >>> branches in subsystem. I'm fine either way. >>> >>> Viresh and Mike, how do you think about that? >> >> For cpufreq subsystem changes, you can take them in your tree. >> > Hi Viresh, OK, I will take the cpufreq changes with your ack. Thanks for > your confirmation. > > Hi Mike and Sylwester, > How can we handle this series well without any problems? hmm... > Still I need to get clock guys' ack or any comments on this series... - Kukjin >>>> I'm still hoping that this patchset will make it into v4.2 as there are >>>> no known issues with it (except minor coding nit for patch #5)... >>>> >>> Sure, why not :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/