Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:20:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:20:00 -0500 Received: from h55p111.delphi.afb.lu.se ([130.235.187.184]:23973 "EHLO gagarin.0x63.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:20:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:28:56 +0100 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: lkernel2003@tuxers.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, tobi@tobi.nu Subject: Re: SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, through Cisco PIX Message-ID: <20030127182856.GE20701@h55p111.delphi.afb.lu.se> References:

<20030127.101128.104592362.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030127.101128.104592362.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Anders Gustafsson X-Scanner: exiscan *18dE08-0008Eb-00*MXKiLb9U7QQ* (0x63.nu) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:11:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > I think the clue in this thread is the TCP_NODELAY socket option. > The one post claimed that by turning this on in telnet, it made > telnet exhibit the same problems SSH shows. This is a "me too", well actually not me, but some friends is seeing this. If I remember correctly the data was actually sent to the server and only the response was lost (seen be stracing the shell on the server). Someone suggested that it might be the sequence-number beeing screwed up. -- Anders Gustafsson - andersg@0x63.nu - http://0x63.nu/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/