Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751445AbbFDFOW (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 01:14:22 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:56733 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbbFDFOP (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 01:14:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 22:14:11 -0700 From: Darren Hart To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: Finn Thain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 07/24] x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use arch_nvram_ops methods instead of nvram_read_byte() and nvram_write_byte() Message-ID: <20150604051411.GB31158@fury.dvhart.com> References: <20150531010132.289674310@telegraphics.com.au> <20150531010134.129479218@telegraphics.com.au> <20150531041114.GA30431@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20150531143422.GA12337@khazad-dum.debian.net> <1433239768.902135.284523153.1200C3E3@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20150603033401.GB49670@vmdeb7> <1433327833.2629421.285594817.4B21A0BD@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1433327833.2629421.285594817.4B21A0BD@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1296 Lines: 31 On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 07:37:13AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 00:34, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:09:28AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > > wrote: > > > Test results were sent to me privately, and they are correct, so... > > > > Finn, unless there is some compelling reason not to - like they are MBs > > worth of > > data, please submit these to the list in the future so we have them for > > reference. > > After I told him which exact bitmask to use on a T43 to test > hotkey_source_mask, his test results can be summarized as "I could see > no difference in behavior", which is *exactly* what I expected to > happen. > > If anything went wrong with the thinkpad-acpi NVRAM code, you'd notice a > very large change in behavior (typical: hotkeys don't work, less > typical: random hotkey keypresses, hotkey press bursts, low responsivity > of hotkeys). Perfect, thanks for the update so we have it recorded here on the list. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/