Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:05:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:05:37 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:56712 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:05:36 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20030127210954.00c73468@pop.gmx.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:11:37 +0100 To: Zwane Mwaikambo From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: 2.5.59-mm6 Cc: Luuk van der Duim , In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.1.6.2.20030127191904.00cc2508@pop.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 02:17 PM 1/27/2003 -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: >On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > (something seems funky with nmi_watchdog... hard lock = no_more_nmi_ticks > > . Anybody out there know enough about local APIC to explain why idle=poll > > gives nice 1 second nmi, but everything else depends upon cpu load?... and > > why when hardlock happens, it _stops_) > >Because we base the performance counter on unhalted cycles, whilst the >normal idle function does an hlt. I think the K7 can do halted too. (well bugger, I _know_ I'm gonna regret this;) When can the darn thing actually trigger an oops? -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/