Message-ID: <55702289.8090401@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:33:53 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/9]powerpc/powernv: dt parser function for nest pmu
 and its events
References: <1433260778-26497-1-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1433260778-26497-7-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1433292378.438.58.camel@axtens.net>
In-Reply-To: <1433292378.438.58.camel@axtens.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 5195
Lines: 173


On Wednesday 03 June 2015 06:16 AM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>> +static int nest_pmu_create(struct device_node *dev, int pmu_index)
>> +{
>> +	struct ppc64_nest_ima_events **p8_events_arr;
>> +	struct ppc64_nest_ima_events *p8_events;
>> +	struct property *pp;
>> +	char *buf;
>> +	const __be32 *lval;
>> +	u32 val;
>> +	int len, idx = 0;
>> +	struct nest_pmu *pmu_ptr;
>> +	const char *start, *end;
>> +
>> +	if (!dev)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	pmu_ptr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nest_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!pmu_ptr)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	/* Needed for hotplug/migration */
>> +	per_nestpmu_arr[pmu_index] = pmu_ptr;
>> +
>> +	p8_events_arr = kzalloc((sizeof(struct ppc64_nest_ima_events) * 64),
>> +								GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!p8_events_arr)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	p8_events = (struct ppc64_nest_ima_events *)p8_events_arr;
> I think you're trying to get the first element of the array here: why
> not just `p8_events = p8_events_arr[0];`?
Yes. Will change it.
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Loop through each property
>> +	 */
>> +	for_each_property_of_node(dev, pp) {
>> +		start = pp->name;
>> +		end = start + strlen(start);
>> +		len = strlen(start);
>> +
>> +		if (!strcmp(pp->name, "name")) {
>> +			if (!pp->value ||
>> +			   (strnlen(pp->value, pp->length) >= pp->length))
>> +				return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +			buf = kzalloc(MAX_PMU_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +			if (!buf)
>> +				return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +			sprintf(buf, "Nest_%s", (char *)pp->value);
>> +			pmu_ptr->pmu.name = (char *)buf;
>> +			pmu_ptr->attr_groups[1] = &p8_nest_format_group;
>> +			pmu_ptr->attr_groups[2] = &cpumask_nest_pmu_attr_group;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Skip these, we dont need it */
>> +		if (!strcmp(pp->name, "name") ||
>> +		    !strcmp(pp->name, "phandle") ||
>> +		    !strcmp(pp->name, "device_type") ||
>> +		    !strcmp(pp->name, "linux,phandle"))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		buf = kzalloc(MAX_PMU_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!buf)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +		if (strncmp(pp->name, "unit.", 5) == 0) {
>> +			start += 5;
>> +			len = strlen(start);
>> +			strncpy(buf, start, strlen(start));
> You've just saved strlen(start), you could just use len. This also
> applies in the next case below.
Yes. That is true.

>> +			p8_events->ev_name = buf;
>> +
>> +			if (!pp->value ||
>> +                            (strnlen(pp->value, pp->length) >= pp->length))
>> +				return -EINVAL;
> The strnlen will never be greater than pp->length, so the only case this
> will hit is if strnlen(pp->value, pp->length) == pp->length. This also
> applies again below.

True will change it.
>
>> +
>> +			buf = kzalloc(MAX_PMU_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +			if (!buf)
>> +				return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +			strncpy(buf, (const char *)pp->value, pp->length);
>> +			p8_events->ev_value = buf;
>> +			idx++;
>> +			p8_events++;
>> +
>> +		} else if (strncmp(pp->name, "scale.", 6) == 0) {
>> +			start += 6;
>> +			len = strlen(start);
>> +			strncpy(buf, start, strlen(start));
>> +			p8_events->ev_name = buf;
>> +
>> +			if (!pp->value ||
>> +			   (strnlen(pp->value, pp->length) >= pp->length))
>> +				return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +			buf = kzalloc(MAX_PMU_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +			if (!buf)
>> +				return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +			strncpy(buf, (const char *)pp->value, pp->length);
>> +			p8_events->ev_value = buf;
>> +			idx++;
>> +			p8_events++;
>> +
>> +		} else {
>> +			strncpy(buf, start, len);
> This is the only case where you actually use the orignal version of len.
> This makes me think you could drop the variable entirely and just use
> strlen(start) in all cases. I also don't see where `end` is used
> anywhere in this function: could that be dropped?
Correct. I guess we can drop both len and end. I used "end" for my 
prints during debug.

>> +			p8_events->ev_name = buf;
>> +			lval = of_get_property(dev, pp->name, NULL);
>> +			val = (uint32_t)be32_to_cpup(lval);
>> +
>> +			/*
>> +			* Use DT property value as the event
>> +			*/
> I'm not sure if this is my mailer, but it looks like lines 2 and 3 of
> that comment need to be indented to line up under the * in the first
> line.
No, it is not your mail :). Will fix the indentation.

>> +			buf = kzalloc(MAX_PMU_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +			if (!buf)
>> +                                return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +			sprintf(buf,"event=0x%x", val);
>> +			p8_events->ev_value = buf;
>> +			p8_events++;
>> +			idx++;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> @@ -288,7 +427,7 @@ static int __init nest_pmu_init(void)
>>   	cpumask_chip();
>>   
>>   	/*
>> -	 * Detect the Nest PMU feature
>> +	 * Detect the Nest PMU feature and register the pmus
>>   	 */
>>   	if (nest_ima_detect_parse())
>>   		return 0;
> As the changed comment indicates, this function changes the behaviour of
> nest_ima_detect_parse. Given that it's a new function introduced by this
> patch series, maybe it should also change names.
>
Ok will fix it.
Thanks for the review.
Maddy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/