Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753849AbbFDOd3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:33:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44445 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752646AbbFDOd0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:33:26 -0400 Message-ID: <557061B2.1030802@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:33:22 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bandan Das CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: default legacy PCI device assignment support to "n" References: <1433405164-2484-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 20 On 04/06/2015 16:31, Bandan Das wrote: > > VFIO has proved itself a much better option than KVM's built-in > > device assignment. It is mature, provides better isolation because > > it enforces ACS, and even the userspace code is being tested on > > a wider variety of hardware these days than the legacy support. > > > > Disable legacy device assignment by default. > > Shouldn't we mark it as Deprecated then ? Yes, good idea! You mean just " (DEPRECATED)" after the string, right? Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/