Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932377AbbFEMgD (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:36:03 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:65295 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932093AbbFEMgA (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:36:00 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: ganguly.s@samsung.com Cc: Raghavendra K T , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , SUNEEL KUMAR SURIMANI , VIKRAM MUPPARTHI , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "Waiman.Long@hp.com" , "oleg@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , SHARAN ALLUR , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] arm: Add for atomic half word exchange Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:33:33 +0200 Message-ID: <7355143.I0WcWX47Z6@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <274749765.566061433467033693.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas07c> References: <274749765.566061433467033693.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas07c> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3HRjW2Vx7mnzyqQRp1p66RZtmQV08zo0PKPbrHu/+v/B7hYlXAi esYzU4sE4uXzFtmjUIDdY7BLlfkfmAz117g+7hEfJKM9iNXAjEUZy50WIX5+LobCB5s+H7k CYqgt3wXB+pmWYcjGXzCwLkisU7L9+q1fcBkJdVNQHvlDPMnjVT0ABu9gmviCBaxhp3527/ RqkZacMQJ1Fvk/3t4rXvQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:iZt3q3aknyk=:xJ97MHMzeSO/x38RlgOszv m766u/YFhIN4j3Ns9BuwHtDk2OqE2e7kxPfSY7IlpGhl+8lu00BKnCCgjVEa6+iHwkNEOt+1A BW1y4LktwuuPQ5x8Mb+VYmDOAfbnFXIWZRuXTKtvylNilVFTBeI2UQGBNU0byxjObJctQscXX Zq4+9Iiq6vMkAQr+zATcGOJlw10okTfLiPOQ+zOm2NCT6fGoet/wQJ/wkLZH5TKSx8Wjv1zao GLSs5iitWXryqeiyQQznwaCcRWYl0BexADLzgjKGhq8RpINKF/5bknPexp06DLVsuEIxoPalB C+P2S2eoU0s91hb5enky5KGp7g12E3ZUdh/M3fLyjkeIuigMJY0R+INsAX0YahPkQya6cnYm4 m/9Z+Njtyfiw1Nu4Q8D1V36LjisFPwa0LZya5wCDFm0fGcu72DqqVui/rw4Pt0PCDUWhh5W34 kB8oL9jpMjjWbCNfQAUnASSoY0qWLC9fO+L5LsldtOSOsi5rZGQ2gwFJmnvjiL/phnwk9prgO GlGJf0u0Ca3lVIV+CODV3mRAVUxzxvmmXKLU/vyuHnwnEw18vzhwZc6OnNvMqn+gGCO4hp7ZN Y3eh3MFxX3CrTDz73+QcaTQlJooT1GnPT3jCKJixHHbW77HSce/5MTvfJPBry7R8Pk1ewm/Lo E1ovdn5NjtTLWzsq7LmtWIbBDzBkGe30MhTCJJ+HjdmoP8g== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 774 Lines: 18 On Friday 05 June 2015 01:17:13 Sarbojit Ganguly wrote: > Since the compilation is also a success for CONFIG_CPU_V6 with the patch, > I think we're good to go. I'm not following your logic. Did you create a new patch that addresses compilation with CONFIG_CPU_V6? The original patch should cause a compile error on v6, if it does not, you either have a broken assembler or you forgot to enable the code that uses these instructions. Neither of them would be a reason to merge the patch. Please explain what is going on. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/