Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422656AbbFENBB (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:01:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:33265 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751692AbbFENA6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:00:58 -0400 From: Ingo Molnar To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Denys Vlasenko , Brian Gerst , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Thomas Gleixner Subject: [RFC PATCH] Rename ia32entry.S to entry_64_compat_32.S Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:00:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1433509230-22238-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1072 Lines: 36 I'm wondering what people think about this naming scheme: entry_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 32-bit kernels entry_64.S # 64-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels entry_64_compat_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels Another option would be: arch/x86/entry/sys_32.S arch/x86/entry/sys_64.S arch/x86/entry/sys_64_compat.S ? Thanks, Ingo === Ingo Molnar (1): x86/asm/entry/64/compat: Rename ia32entry.S -> entry_64_compat_32.S arch/x86/entry/Makefile | 2 +- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +- arch/x86/entry/{ia32entry.S => entry_64_compat_32.S} | 0 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename arch/x86/entry/{ia32entry.S => entry_64_compat_32.S} (100%) -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/