Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 08:41:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 08:41:48 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:23567 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 08:41:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:50:54 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrew Morton Cc: Oleg Drokin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext2 FS corruption with 2.5.59. Message-ID: <20030128145054.A7217@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Oleg Drokin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030123153832.A860@namesys.com> <20030124023213.63d93156.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030124023213.63d93156.akpm@digeo.com>; from akpm@digeo.com on Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:32:13AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:32:13AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > But it isn't. It's on inode_in_use. It (and its pages) never get written > out and the data gets thrown away on unmount. Christoph has hit the same > thing. I bet he was running fsstress too. Sorry about that. Yes, I was hitting the bug in XFS's testcase 013 which is based on fsstress. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/