Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752369AbbFGT25 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jun 2015 15:28:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:37657 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751634AbbFGT2t (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jun 2015 15:28:49 -0400 Message-ID: <55749B6D.9090508@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 21:28:45 +0200 From: Mateusz Kulikowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sudip Mukherjee CC: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joe@perches.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: dig_t::dbg_mode References: <1433278095-13988-1-git-send-email-mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com> <1433278095-13988-8-git-send-email-mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com> <20150603072642.GA6897@sudip-PC> <556F458E.20002@gmail.com> <20150604051753.GA6376@sudip-PC> <556FE70F.4020400@gmail.com> <20150604060651.GE6376@sudip-PC> In-Reply-To: <20150604060651.GE6376@sudip-PC> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1840 Lines: 41 On 04.06.2015 08:06, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:50:07AM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >> On 04.06.2015 07:18, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:21:02PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >>>> On 03.06.2015 09:26, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >>>> >>>> No, I missed that - this one should also be removed - probably because of similar naming (DbgMode, dbg_mode). >>>> Thanks for finding it - I'll fix that in v2. >>>> >>>> Apart from that - did you had time/courage to analyze rest of the patches (so I can send v2)? >>> >>> at a first glance looked ok to me. I hope you have checked it on the >>> hardware as well. but maybe Dan can find something. >>> better send v2. >> >> Of course I have checked it, although - as I wrote in past - this driver has not very good performance. > is there any other driver which has better performance on this hardware > than this driver? and how are you measuring the performance? What I meant is that this driver (at least on my HW/SW configuration) is not very reliable. It drops a lot of packages and transmission speed is far from declared. But - as far as I checked - it's not due to my changes (I checked that some time ago). Perhaps my hardware has some issues - I have to buy another rtl8192e card and/or test on Windows to be sure (will do both steps probably). As for measurement, I have simple tests on my home network (WPA2/CCMP): - Scan available networks - Download 1MB file, check md5 - Ping router/gateway Regards, Mateusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/