Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751599AbbFHEJZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 00:09:25 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45043 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750729AbbFHEJR (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 00:09:17 -0400 Message-ID: <55751564.20609@suse.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 06:09:08 +0200 From: Juergen Gross User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jeremy@goop.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, akataria@vmware.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, gleb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead References: <1430391243-7112-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <1430391243-7112-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2399 Lines: 52 Ping? Anything missing from my side? On 04/30/2015 12:53 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > Paravirtualized spinlocks produce some overhead even if the kernel is > running on bare metal. The main reason are the more complex locking > and unlocking functions. Especially unlocking is no longer just one > instruction but so complex that it is no longer inlined. > > This patch series addresses this issue by adding two more pvops > functions to reduce the size of the inlined spinlock functions. When > running on bare metal unlocking is again basically one instruction. > > Compile tested with CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS on and off, 32 and 64 > bits. > > Functional testing on bare metal and as Xen dom0. > > Correct patching verified by disassembly of active kernel. > > Juergen Gross (6): > x86: use macro instead of "0" for setting TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG > x86: move decision about clearing slowpath flag into arch_spin_lock() > x86: introduce new pvops function clear_slowpath > x86: introduce new pvops function spin_unlock > x86: switch config from UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK to INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK > x86: remove no longer needed paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 - > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 13 +++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 12 ++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 53 ++++++++++++----------------------- > arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 3 +- > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 14 +-------- > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 12 ++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 23 +-------------- > include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 2 +- > kernel/Kconfig.locks | 7 +++-- > kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 3 +- > kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 2 +- > lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 - > 16 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/