Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:25:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:25:53 -0500 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:38616 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:25:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:35:10 -0600 (CST) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: Richard Henderson cc: Rusty Russell , Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] new modversions implementation In-Reply-To: <20030128083117.A15637@twiddle.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:38:31PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > > But once again you are relying on link order to keep the crcs > > section in the same order as the ksymtab section (although the ld > > documentation says that's correct, I know RTH doesn't like it). > > What gave you that idea? Link order is a fine thing to rely on. Cool, so I don't even need to start arguing ;) I was about to suggest adding a script like per_cpu_check to detect if the linker went crazy on us and complain, but now I hope rusty is convinced already. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/