Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:04:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:04:21 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:58633 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:04:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:10:49 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Rusty Russell cc: Mikael Pettersson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.5] initrd/mkinitrd still not working In-Reply-To: <20030128012921.8F7DB2C56F@lists.samba.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message <200301201457.PAA25276@harpo.it.uu.se> you write: > > As to why the .o -> .ko name change was necessary, I have no idea. > > Rusty? > > It's getting furthur and furthur from a normal .o. Kai actually did > the patch (that, of course, is what the K stands for 8). Yeah, I think I noted that .ko was a good idea, just to prevent confusion. However, the original post I made was sort of a subtle hint, let me stop beating around the bush: how about adding mkinitrd to the other module stuff before 0.9.9 is really released, using the same .old technique used for insmod et al? It would allow people doing testing of both 2.4 and 2.5 kernels to stop fighting build issues. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/