Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:50:01 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, boaz@plexistor.com,
        david@fromorbit.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
        ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
        benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, tj@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
        hpa@zytor.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, willy@linux.intel.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] x86: support kmap_atomic_pfn_t() for persistent
	memory
Message-ID: <20150609065001.GA10167@lst.de>
References: <20150605205052.20751.77149.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150605211912.20751.35406.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150605211912.20751.35406.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 426
Lines: 8

The code is mostly generic, so the x86 in the subject is a little misleading.
What keeps the Kconfig symbol in x86 anyway?  Is there a reason why
it can't be made entirely generic?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/