Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:03:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:03:09 -0500 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:1963 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:03:08 -0500 Message-Id: <200301290115.h0T1FsI05742@es175.pdx.osdl.net> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] DBT2 results question Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:15:54 -0800 From: Cliff White Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As Andrew Morton requested, we have rerun the OSDL Database Test 2 on cached and non-cached versions comparing 2.4.21-pre3 and 2.5.49 and this time we have vmstat data. Actually, we have a _ton of data, which is why i'm posting this. What data in particular are you kernel coders looking for? We could graph each statistic for each set of runs for a side by side comparison 2.4 versus 2.5. We can also post the raw data, but 40 runs is a bit much to post on a mailing list. What would you find most useful? We will get the runs Andrew requested on 2.5.58 when we can get past the I/O bug Dave Olien reported last week. cliffw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/