Message-ID: <3E372DC5.10466574@digeo.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:29 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] DBT2 results question
References: <200301290115.h0T1FsI05742@es175.pdx.osdl.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Cliff White wrote:
> 
> As Andrew Morton requested, we have rerun the OSDL Database Test 2 on cached
> and non-cached versions comparing 2.4.21-pre3 and 2.5.49 and this time
> we have vmstat data.
> Actually, we have a _ton of data, which is why i'm posting this.
> What data in particular are you kernel coders looking for?
> 
>  We could graph each statistic for each set of runs for a side by
> side comparison 2.4 versus 2.5.
> 
> We can also post the raw data, but 40 runs is a bit much to post on a mailing
>  list.
> 
> What would you find most useful?

Didn't you have a standardised set of number for the dbt1 runs?  They
were pretty good if I recall correctly.

It is very hard to find dbt1 results at osdl.org.  I normally have to
grep the lse-tech archives to find anything at all.

Ah yes.
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt1prfrns/results/2proc/linux-2.4.18-1tier/index.html

That seems a reasonable summary.

>  We will get the runs Andrew requested on 2.5.58 when we can get past the
> I/O bug Dave Olien reported last week.

That isn't fixed yet, and there's no workaround, alas.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/