Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932466AbbFIXwF (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:52:05 -0400 Received: from na3sys010aog106.obsmtp.com ([74.125.245.80]:46779 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751380AbbFIXv6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:51:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Roland Dreier Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:51:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79 To: LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , George McCollister Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 934 Lines: 20 On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: > I understand that the change here fixed another regression, but I'm > wondering if there's a way to make everyone happy here? I can provide > debugging info from my system as required... Maybe sent my mail too quickly, as I have some thoughts after looking at the code. >From the link order, drivers/acpi init wll be called before drivers/pnp init, right? In my case, the acpi resources ("ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK") etc are under a pnp bus. But if acpi requests the resources first, then pnp can't request the enclosing range. Is the right fix to make sure the pnp init happens before acpi requests resources? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/