Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754111AbbFJBuJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 21:50:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:36708 "EHLO mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751748AbbFJBuD (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 21:50:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150609074946.GG5222@piout.net> References: <1390339396-3479-43-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20150608195455.GF5222@piout.net> <20150608210634.GJ7125@windriver.com> <20150609074946.GG5222@piout.net> From: Paul Gortmaker Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 21:49:31 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DLWDqYlDf9AhfaTaQiBfvAi1I_g Message-ID: Subject: Re: [42/73] rtc: delete non-required instances of include To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: LKML , linux-arch , Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2097 Lines: 49 On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 08/06/2015 at 17:06:34 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote : >> > I've contemplated applying that patch but I'm not sure it is actually a >> > good idea because those 46 drivers are using a variant of module_driver >> > which actually uses __init and __exit. After your patch it is still >> > working simply because init.h gets included that way: >> >> Firstly, I am kind of curious why an 18 month old patch is getting >> replied to now. That aside, this interdependence between module.h and >> init.h was reconsidered and you can see the resolution solution here: >> >> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433276168-21550-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com >> >> To summarize what is said there, yes - you can ignore the one line >> removals for now. We will revisit them after the above is merged. >> > > I've taken the RTC subsystem maintainership and I've been sorting the > 2372 patches left in patchwork down to 126 and yours was one of these. > > Seeing your answer, I think my question was legitimate. I'll be happy to > take your revised patch once ready. Yes, it was a legit (and correct) spotting ; just some months late. :) I'll be sure to make sure you are CC'd on any updates. And thanks for taking over maintainership of the rtc subsystem. I'll go out on a limb here and guess that the original rtc driver author ; that idiot never imagined it would become a subsystem, else he'd thank you as well. Paul. -- > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/