Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:58:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:58:19 -0500 Received: from modemcable092.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.92]:58128 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:58:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 03:06:55 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk cc: Stefan Reinauer , Robert Morris , Raphael Schmid , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: Bootscreen In-Reply-To: <200301281452.02856.roy@karlsbakk.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > On Tuesday 28 January 2003 14:32, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > * Robert Morris [030128 12:20]: > > > There is a very simple reason why Linux shouldn't have a "bootscreen" - > > > its a lame idea. We have copied enough of the bad "features" of Windows > > > et al into Linux already, IMHO. > > I'm working for a company doing VoD and IPTV applications, and you surely > don't want some verbose kernel output upon booting set-top-boxes. At least - > the customer doesn't want it, meaning you shouldn't have it. Then it's better > to have some LED flashing in case of error. Then don't output kernel messages to your default display device. No Kernel Hacking Required (tm) Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/