Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:25:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:25:10 -0500 Received: from mail2.webart.de ([195.30.14.11]:32778 "EHLO mail2.webart.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:25:09 -0500 Message-ID: <398E93A81CC5D311901600A0C9F2928946939B@cubuss2> From: Raphael Schmid To: "'Richard B. Tilley \"\"(Brad)'" , Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Cc: John Bradford , jeff millar , rob@r-morris.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Scaring the non-geeks (was Bootscreen) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:25:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > How do positive terms such as OK or YES scare people? The problem is not necessarily the init scripts. Each distributor can customise these quite easily. The problem is (how I see it) divided into two parts: I. The kernel messages. (And yes, I do know about both, "quiet" and "console=/foo/bar) II. Both, using "quiet" or "console=/foo/bar", and customising the init scripts only leaves you with a blank, black screen. Now, you might argue how "classic" or "beatieful" black is. But it should be obvious this is an absolute matter of taste. A nice picture is far more appealing, and pleasing, and whatnot. - Raphael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/