Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:22:36 -0500
From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: clustered MD
Message-ID: <20150610192236.GE333@redhat.com>
References: <55773DE1.7080107@suse.com>
 <20150609194505.GA17536@redhat.com>
 <557747AB.7080706@suse.com>
 <20150609203056.GB17536@redhat.com>
 <5577AFF4.6020505@suse.com>
 <20150610150151.GA333@redhat.com>
 <5578575F.1040006@suse.com>
 <20150610154834.GC333@redhat.com>
 <5578647D.102@suse.com>
 <20150610170533.GD333@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150610170533.GD333@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 823
Lines: 16

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:05:33PM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> Separate bitmaps for each node sounds like a much better design than the
> cmirror design which used a single shared bitmap (I argued for using a
> single bitmap when cmirror was being designed.)

Sorry misspoke, I argued for one bitmap per node, like you're doing, so in
general I think you're starting off in a much better direction than I saw
before.  (I still doubt there's enough value in this to do it at all,
which is another reason I'm particularly interested to see some real world
success with this.)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/