Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:03:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:03:45 -0500 Received: from taz.cerebus.com ([208.254.26.145]:31970 "EHLO taz.cerebus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:03:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:12:54 -0500 (EST) From: David C Niemi To: "David S. Miller" cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, , , , , , , Subject: Re: [TEST FIX] Re: SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, In-Reply-To: <20030128.160806.13210372.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:56:41 +0300 (MSK) > > Hey! Interesting thing has just happened, it is the first time when I > found the bug formulating a senstence while writing e-mail not while > peering to code. :-) > > Congratulations :-) Just to confirm, this fix works for me as well. ... > Indeed, this bug exists in 2.4 as well of course. > > This bug is 2.4.3 vintage :-) It got added as part of initial > zerocopy merge in fact. Odd, then, that it I was unable to reproduce the SSH hangs under 2.4.18 even once, despite heavily using it for several days under the same circumstances. Is there any reason 2.4.x would be better able to recover? 2.5.59 with the fix seems to feel a bit less balky than 2.4.18 without the fix, so it seemed to me that 2.4.18 had some way of recovering at the cost of a several second pause in the session. DCN - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/