Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:07:44 -0500
From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clustered MD
Message-ID: <20150610210744.GG333@redhat.com>
References: <20150609182102.GA4305@redhat.com>
 <55773DE1.7080107@suse.com>
 <20150609194505.GA17536@redhat.com>
 <557747AB.7080706@suse.com>
 <20150609203056.GB17536@redhat.com>
 <5577AFF4.6020505@suse.com>
 <20150610150151.GA333@redhat.com>
 <20150611063131.51fa2ddb@home.neil.brown.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150611063131.51fa2ddb@home.neil.brown.name>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1173
Lines: 27

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:31:31AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> What is your interest in this?  I'm always happy for open discussion and
> varied input, but it would help to know to what extent you are a stake
> holder?

Using the dlm correctly is non-trivial and should be reviewed.
If the dlm is misused, some part of that may fall in my lap, if
only so far as having to debug problems to distinguish between dlm
bugs or md-cluster bugs.  This has been learned the hard way.

I have yet to find time to look up the previous review discussion.
I will be more than happy if I find the dlm usage has already been
thoroughly reviewed.

> Also a slightly less adversarial tone would make me feel more
> comfortable, though maybe I'm misreading your intent.

You're probably misreading "concerned".

The initial responses to my inquiry were severely lacking in any
substance, even dismissive, which raised "concerned" to "troubled".

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/