Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754167AbbFJWLa (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:11:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43431 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750812AbbFJWLW (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:11:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:11:20 -0500 From: David Teigland To: Neil Brown Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: clustered MD Message-ID: <20150610221120.GA12377@redhat.com> References: <20150609182102.GA4305@redhat.com> <55773DE1.7080107@suse.com> <20150609194505.GA17536@redhat.com> <557747AB.7080706@suse.com> <20150609203056.GB17536@redhat.com> <5577AFF4.6020505@suse.com> <20150610150151.GA333@redhat.com> <20150611063131.51fa2ddb@home.neil.brown.name> <20150610210744.GG333@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150610210744.GG333@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 869 Lines: 19 On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:07:44PM -0500, David Teigland wrote: > > Also a slightly less adversarial tone would make me feel more > > comfortable, though maybe I'm misreading your intent. > > You're probably misreading "concerned". > > The initial responses to my inquiry were severely lacking in any > substance, even dismissive, which raised "concerned" to "troubled". Reading those messages again I see what you mean, they don't sound very nice, so sorry about that. I'll repeat the one positive note, which is that the brief things I've noticed make it look much better than the dm approach from several years ago. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/