Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753202AbbFKJv1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 11 Jun 2015 05:51:27 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:33913 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751797AbbFKJvU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 11 Jun 2015 05:51:20 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:51:44 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Add some <foo>_destroy functions to
 NEEDLESS_IF tests
Message-ID: <20150611095144.GC515@swordfish>
References: <1433851493-23685-1-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
 <20150609142523.b717dba6033ee08de997c8be@linux-foundation.org>
 <1433894769.2730.87.camel@perches.com>
 <1433911166.2730.98.camel@perches.com>
 <1433915549.2730.107.camel@perches.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506111140240.2320@hadrien>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506111140240.2320@hadrien>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+89 (0255b37be491) (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 840
Lines: 28

On (06/11/15 11:41), Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> > Sergey Senozhatsky has modified several destroy functions that can
> > now be called with NULL values.
> >
> >  - kmem_cache_destroy()
> >  - mempool_destroy()
> >  - dma_pool_destroy()
> 
> I don't actually see any null test in the definition of dma_pool_destroy,
> in the linux-next 54896f27dd5 (20150610).  So I guess it would be
> premature to send patches to remove the null tests.
> 

yes,

Andrew Morton:
: I'll park these patches until after 4.1 is released - it's getting to
: that time...


	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/