Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755461AbbFLNQ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:16:58 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:32895 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754755AbbFLNQw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:16:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:16:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Baolin Wang cc: arnd@arndb.de, john.stultz@linaro.org, heenasirwani@gmail.com, pang.xunlei@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net, riel@redhat.com, cl@linux.com, tj@kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, ahh@google.com, pjt@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, serge.hallyn@canonical.com, james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, pmoore@redhat.com, tiwai@suse.de, jeffv@google.com, jlayton@primarydata.com, keescook@chromium.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, mark.d.rustad@intel.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/24] Convert the posix_clock_operations and k_clock structure to ready for 2038 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 877 Lines: 29 On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote: Sigh. Again threading of the series failed. Some patches are, the whole series is not. Can you please get your tools straight? You neither managed to cc me on the security patch. > - Modify the subject line and the changelog: > timekeeping: Change the implementation of timekeeping_clocktai() Sigh. How is that better than the previous one? It's more accurate, but equally useless. And of course you did not address my request to change the macro mess in > posix-timers: Introduce {get,put}_timespec and {get,put}_itimerspec according to the discussion with Arnd. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/