Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755858AbbFONn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:43:28 -0400 Received: from mail-yh0-f47.google.com ([209.85.213.47]:34464 "EHLO mail-yh0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754183AbbFONnS (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:43:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1434137896-13806-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <1434137896-13806-5-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:42:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] Documentation: ABI: /sys/firmware/devicetree/overlays To: Pantelis Antoniou Cc: Grant Likely , Andrew Morton , Matt Porter , Koen Kooi , Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1855 Lines: 49 On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Rob, > >> On Jun 15, 2015, at 16:24 , Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou >> wrote: >>> Documentation ABI entry for overlays sysfs entries. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou >>> --- >>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-devicetree-overlays | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-devicetree-overlays >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-devicetree-overlays b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-devicetree-overlays >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..be2d28b >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-devicetree-overlays >>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ [...] >>> + >>> + targets: A file containing the list of targets of each overlay >>> + with each line containing a target. >> >> We have OF nodes in sysfs now. Would it be more useful if we created >> links to the target nodes instead of having a list of names? >> > > Probably, this interface is merely informational; things get complicated by > the fact that there can be more than one target in each overlay. Right, you would need 'targetN' or perhaps '' (with a '.N' for duplicates) as the link names. If it is informational, then perhaps debugfs should be used instead? What else if anything do you envision adding here? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/