Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:15:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:15:57 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:49882 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:15:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:21:56 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Hans Reiser Cc: Con Kolivas , linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest Message-ID: <20030131152156.GA15977@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Hans Reiser , Con Kolivas , linux kernel mailing list References: <200302010020.34119.conman@kolivas.net> <3E3A7C22.1080709@namesys.com> <200302010040.49141.conman@kolivas.net> <3E3A8077.9050409@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3A8077.9050409@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:56:07PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive, > and thus a better FS benchmark. > > What do you think? It's hardly a realistic real-world benchmark if you start nobbling bits of it though. Not reading the preprocessed output is sure to bump the benchmark points on an fs optimised for lots of small writes. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/