Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756853AbbFPRhT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:37:19 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0094.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.94]:42053 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752176AbbFPRhN (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:37:13 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:966:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1431:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2196:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2897:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3871:3872:3874:4385:5007:6119:6261:7875:7903:9010:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11658:11914:12043:12294:12296:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13172:13229:13311:13357:14096:14097:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: magic68_2199160611012 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2272 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:37:09 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Wagner , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Daniel Wagner , LKML Subject: Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Message-ID: <20150616133709.6c53645d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <55805AC5.8020507@plumgrid.com> References: <557F509D.2000509@plumgrid.com> <20150615230702.GB3913@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <557F7764.5060707@plumgrid.com> <20150616021458.GE3913@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <557FB7E1.6080004@plumgrid.com> <20150616122733.GG3913@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <558018DD.1080701@monom.org> <55805AC5.8020507@plumgrid.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1369 Lines: 35 On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:20:05 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 6/16/15 5:38 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > static int free_thread(void *arg) > > +{ > > + unsigned long flags; > > + struct htab_elem *l; > > + > > + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&elem_freelist_lock, flags); > > + while (!list_empty(&elem_freelist)) { > > + l = list_entry(elem_freelist.next, > > + struct htab_elem, list); > > + list_del(&l->list); > > + kfree(l); > > that's not right, since such thread defeats rcu protection of lookup. > We need either kfree_rcu/call_rcu or synchronize_rcu. > Obviously the former is preferred that's why I'm still digging into it. > Probably a thread that does kfree_rcu would be ok, but we shouldn't > be doing it unconditionally. For all networking programs and 99% > of tracing programs the existing code is fine and I don't want to > slow it down to tackle the corner case. > Extra spin_lock just to add it to the list is also quite costly. Use a irq_work() handler to do the kfree_rcu(), and use llist (lockless list) to add items to the list. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/