Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757483AbbFQAha (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:37:30 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:54429 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757355AbbFQAhT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:37:19 -0400 From: Andy Lutomirski To: x86@kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , John Stultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Huang Rui , Denys Vlasenko , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , Andy Lutomirski Subject: [PATCH v3 15/18] x86/tsc: Use rdtsc_ordered() in check_tsc_warp() and drop extra barriers Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:36:03 -0700 Message-Id: <387c4c3a75f875bcde6cd68cee013273a744f364.1434501121.git.luto@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.4.2 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2234 Lines: 76 Using get_cycles was unnecessary: check_tsc_warp() is not called on TSC-less systems. Replace rdtsc_barrier(); get_cycles() with rdtsc_ordered(). While we're at it, make the somewhat more dangerous change of removing barrier_before_rdtsc after RDTSC in the TSC warp check code. This should be okay, though -- the vDSO TSC code doesn't have that barrier, so, if removing the barrier from the warp check would cause us to detect a warp that we otherwise wouldn't detect, then we have a genuine bug. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski --- arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c index dd8d0791dfb5..78083bf23ed1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c @@ -39,16 +39,15 @@ static cycles_t max_warp; static int nr_warps; /* - * TSC-warp measurement loop running on both CPUs: + * TSC-warp measurement loop running on both CPUs. This is not called + * if there is no TSC. */ static void check_tsc_warp(unsigned int timeout) { cycles_t start, now, prev, end; int i; - rdtsc_barrier(); - start = get_cycles(); - rdtsc_barrier(); + start = rdtsc_ordered(); /* * The measurement runs for 'timeout' msecs: */ @@ -63,9 +62,7 @@ static void check_tsc_warp(unsigned int timeout) */ arch_spin_lock(&sync_lock); prev = last_tsc; - rdtsc_barrier(); - now = get_cycles(); - rdtsc_barrier(); + now = rdtsc_ordered(); last_tsc = now; arch_spin_unlock(&sync_lock); @@ -126,7 +123,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu) /* * No need to check if we already know that the TSC is not - * synchronized: + * synchronized or if we have no TSC. */ if (unsynchronized_tsc()) return; @@ -190,6 +187,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_target(void) { int cpus = 2; + /* Also aborts if there is no TSC. */ if (unsynchronized_tsc() || tsc_clocksource_reliable) return; -- 2.4.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/