Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754366AbbFQI0g (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2015 04:26:36 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]:34169 "EHLO mail-la0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752581AbbFQI0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2015 04:26:32 -0400 Message-ID: <55812F32.5030306@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:26:26 +0300 From: Alexander Drozdov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frans Klaver , Maninder Singh CC: davem@davemloft.net, willemb@google.com, dborkman@redhat.com, Al Viro , eyal.birger@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , pankaj.m@samsung.com Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT Patch 1/1] net: replace if()/BUG with BUG_ON References: <1434515761-14796-1-git-send-email-maninder1.s@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1732 Lines: 44 On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:36:11 +0200, Frans Klaver wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Maninder Singh wrote: >> Use BUG_ON(condition) instead of if(condition)/BUG() . >> >> Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh >> Reviewed-by: Akhilesh Kumar >> --- >> net/packet/af_packet.c | 3 +-- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c >> index b5989c6..c91d405 100644 >> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c >> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c >> @@ -547,8 +547,7 @@ static void prb_setup_retire_blk_timer(struct packet_sock *po, int tx_ring) >> { >> struct tpacket_kbdq_core *pkc; >> >> - if (tx_ring) >> - BUG(); >> + BUG_ON(tx_ring); >> >> pkc = tx_ring ? GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB(&po->tx_ring) : >> GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB(&po->rx_ring); > > I don't get this. We're not allowed to be using tx_ring, but we can > and do handle it? Does that still warrant a BUG() or BUG_ON()? It's > been in since the function introduction[0]. Can somebody explain? TPACKET_V3 doesn't support tx for now, so the function is actualy never called with non-zero tx_ring. I think there were plans to add the support. But retire timer for tx will not be needed anyway as it is up to user to fill the ring buffer. > Thanks, > Frans > > [0] f6fb8f100b80 (af-packet: TPACKET_V3 flexible buffer implementation.) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/