Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:04:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:04:15 -0500 Received: from mail019.syd.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.20.160]:28614 "EHLO mail019.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:04:14 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Con Kolivas To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.59-mm7 with contest Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:13:36 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: linux kernel mailing list References: <200302010930.54538.conman@kolivas.net> <3E3B0030.5580060A@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <3E3B0030.5580060A@digeo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200302011013.36125.conman@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 01 Feb 2003 10:01 am, Andrew Morton wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > ... > > io_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > 2.5.59 3 153 50.3 8 13.7 1.94 > > 2.5.59-mm6 2 90 83.3 2 6.7 1.15 > > 2.5.59-mm7 5 110 68.2 2 6.4 1.41 > > read_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > 2.5.59 3 102 76.5 5 4.9 1.29 > > 2.5.59-mm6 3 733 10.8 56 6.3 9.40 > > 2.5.59-mm7 4 90 84.4 1 1.3 1.15 > > The background loads took some punishment. Yes and I'd say a ratio of only 1.15 suggests kernel compilation got an unfair share of the resources. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/