Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:20:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:20:24 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:16910 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:20:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3E3B066B.8010905@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:27:39 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J.A. Magallon" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Perl in the toolchain References: <20030131133929.A8992@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030131194837.GC8298@gtf.org> <20030131213827.GA1541@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <20030131213827.GA1541@werewolf.able.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org J.A. Magallon wrote: > On 2003.01.31 Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:41:26PM -0600, Kai Germaschewski wrote: >> >>>Generally, we've been trying to not make perl a prequisite for the kernel >>>build, and I'd like to keep it that way. Except for some arch specific >> >>That's pretty much out the window when klibc gets merged, so perl will >>indeed be a build requirement for all platforms... >> > > > So in short, kernel people: > - do not want perl in the kernel build > - allow qt to pollute the kernel to have a decent gui config tool > - have to rewrite half perl features in C > - but perl will be needed anyways > > instead of > - do all parsing in perl, that is what perl is for and what is mainly done > in kconfig scripts > - do the config backend in perl, and... > - do the gui in perl-XXX, so you can have perl-GTK, perl-GTK2, perl-QT or > perl-Tk, even perl-Xaw (so you get rid of tcl/tk) > > I really do not understand... Well, you appear to be taking the superset of opinions, which is guaranteed to generate a paradox, I should think ;-) Specifically regarding kconf, it does not require Qt; Qt is merely an optional piece. For Perl, yes I personally think it is needed anyway. And re-creating Perl's features in C, just to avoid Perl, is not the best technical solution when developers already have Perl installed. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/