Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 06:00:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 06:00:46 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:12694 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 06:00:46 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:10:08 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: Chris Bradford Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Current Status of Module Utilities for 2.5 Kernels? Message-ID: <20030201111008.GR12286@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030201081352.GQ12286@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [lkml-read@khat-fox.com] > > > > Yes, you need to read the archives prior to posting a question > > to see if another 50 people haven't posted the same one before. > > > Ah, the archives. Would these be the same archives that are both > incomplete, and scattered across three, maybe more, locations? Kernel > Traffic is the best of the lot, and I had problems searching it. I do a > simple search for 'modutils' and it spits out 350+K of stuff. Stuff that > has absolutely nothing to do with the module utilities. And now you're looking even more silly, because instead of saying something like "ok, thanks," you start babbling absolute nonsense about archives being incomplete and scattered. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel -- Tomas Szepe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/