Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 09:59:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 09:59:14 -0500 Received: from mailg.telia.com ([194.22.194.26]:60098 "EHLO mailg.telia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 09:59:14 -0500 X-Original-Recipient: Message-ID: <004701c2ca03$cb467460$020120b0@jockeXP> From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: Subject: NETIF_F_SG question Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 16:08:36 +0100 Organization: Lumentis AB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am thinking of implementing harware scatter/gatter support( NETIF_F_SG) in my ethernet driver. The network device cannot do HW checksuming. Will the IP stack make use of the SG support and will there be any significant performance improvement? Jocke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/