Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754154AbbFSHPv (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:15:51 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]:35403 "EHLO mail-yk0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570AbbFSHPp (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:15:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [195.54.192.99] In-Reply-To: <20150618161727.GA6546@lst.de> References: <20150611095338.GA4492@lst.de> <20150618161727.GA6546@lst.de> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:15:44 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] ppc64 LE ABI v2 ftrace-with-regs implementation From: Denis Kirjanov To: Torsten Duwe Cc: Steven Rostedt , Michael Ellerman , Jiri Kosina , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 772 Lines: 23 On 6/18/15, Torsten Duwe wrote: > Did I miss anything else? I have the notrace optimisations and > kernel live patching in the queue, which depends on this, so I'd > really appreciate a comment whether it is acceptable in this form > or not. Thanks in advance! Hi Torsten, could you provide a description how you did test that. Thanks. > > Torsten > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/