Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932182AbbFSIGB (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 04:06:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46648 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752379AbbFSIFt (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 04:05:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:05:46 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Igor Mammedov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andrey@xdel.ru Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] vhost: support upto 509 memory regions Message-ID: <20150619100409-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <20150618112004-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20150618133912.63636a47@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20150618134040-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <5582B088.1090207@redhat.com> <20150618142455-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <5582CBA6.5070105@redhat.com> <20150618164559-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <5582EBA6.1080607@redhat.com> <20150619095515-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <5583CB62.6030405@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5583CB62.6030405@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2694 Lines: 69 On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:57:22AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 19/06/2015 09:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 06:02:46PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 18/06/2015 16:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>> However, with Igor's patches a memory_region_del_subregion will cause a > >>>> mmap(MAP_NORESERVE), which _does_ have the effect of making the hva go away. > >>>> > >>>> I guess one way to do it would be to alias the same page in two places, > >>>> one for use by vhost and one for use by everything else. However, the > >>>> kernel does not provide the means to do this kind of aliasing for > >>>> anonymous mmaps. > >>> > >>> Basically pages go away on munmap, so won't simple > >>> lock > >>> munmap > >>> mmap(MAP_NORESERVE) > >>> unlock > >>> do the trick? > >> > >> Not sure I follow. Here we have this: > >> > >> VCPU 1 VCPU 2 I/O worker > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> take big QEMU lock > >> p = address_space_map(hva, len) > >> pass I/O request to worker thread > >> read(fd, p, len) > >> release big QEMU lock > >> > >> memory_region_del_subregion > >> mmap(MAP_NORESERVE) > >> > >> read returns EFAULT > > > > Why doesn't it EFAULT without mmap(MAP_NORESERVE)? > > Doesn't memory_region_del_subregion free the memory? > > No, only destruction of the memory region frees it. address_space_map > takes a reference to the memory region and address_space_unmap releases it. > > Paolo Confused. So can we call mmap(MAP_NORESERVE) in address_space_unmap after we detect refcount is 0? > >> wake up VCPU 1 > >> take big QEMU lock > >> EFAULT? What's that? > >> > >> In another scenario you are less lucky: the memory accesses > >> between address_space_map/unmap aren't done in the kernel and > >> you get a plain old SIGSEGV. > >> > >> This is not something that you can fix with a lock. The very > >> purpose of the map/unmap API is to do stuff asynchronously while > >> the lock is released. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/