Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 03:30:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 03:30:23 -0500 Received: from wohnheim.fh-wedel.de ([195.37.86.122]:2230 "EHLO wohnheim.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 03:30:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:39:11 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Daniel Egger , Pavel Machek , kernel list Subject: Re: Compactflash cards dying? Message-ID: <20030203083910.GB2287@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20030202223009.GA344@elf.ucw.cz> <1044232591.545.8.camel@sonja> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1069 Lines: 29 On Sun, 2 February 2003 21:04:23 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Egger writes: > > Daniel> CF has limited write cycles. A few hundred if you're lucky. > > However, I have yet to see a CF card which didn't survive beyond a > million writes. > > Note that CF cards do transparent wear averaging inside. So it's > obviously not a million writes to the same physical spot. Also, most > vendors claim they have spare blocks for relocating areas that are > completely worn out. This apears to be the same statement, except that Daniel forgot to add "per block". J?rn -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s+: a- C++ UL++++ P+(++) L++++$ !E W++ N+ o? K? w- O- M- V? PS+(++) PE++ Y+ PGP>+ t+@ 5? X+ R@ !tv b+ DI+ !D G- e h-- r y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/