Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:48:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:48:44 -0500 Received: from jaguar.mkp.net ([66.11.169.42]:54450 "EHLO jaguar.mkp.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:48:43 -0500 To: =?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Daniel Egger , Pavel Machek , kernel list Subject: Re: Compactflash cards dying? From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: mkp.net References: <20030202223009.GA344@elf.ucw.cz> <1044232591.545.8.camel@sonja> <20030203083910.GB2287@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Date: 03 Feb 2003 08:58:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20030203083910.GB2287@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 877 Lines: 16 >>>>> "J?rn" == J?rn Engel writes: >> Note that CF cards do transparent wear averaging inside. So it's >> obviously not a million writes to the same physical spot. Also, >> most vendors claim they have spare blocks for relocating areas that >> are completely worn out. J?rn> This apears to be the same statement, except that Daniel forgot J?rn> to add "per block". They'd have to use really shitty flash parts to go as low as 100 writes per physical block. Off by a couple of orders of magnitude. -- Martin K. Petersen Wild Open Source, Inc. mkp@wildopensource.com http://www.wildopensource.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/