Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:11:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] media: pxa_camera: trivial move of dma irq functions
In-Reply-To: <87y4je831c.fsf@belgarion.home>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1506211810240.7745@axis700.grange>
References: <1426980085-12281-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <1426980085-12281-4-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1506201503550.31977@axis700.grange> <87y4je831c.fsf@belgarion.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 921
Lines: 25

On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

> Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> >> +static void pxa_camera_dma_irq(struct pxa_camera_dev *pcdev,
> >> +			       enum pxa_camera_active_dma act_dma);
> >> +
> >> +static void pxa_camera_dma_irq_y(void *data)
> >
> > Wait, how is this patch trivial? You change pxa_camera_dma_irq_?() 
> > prototypes, which are used as PXA DMA callbacks. Does this mean, that 
> > either before or after this patch compilation is broken?
> 
> Jeez you're right.
> So I can either fold that with patch 4, or try to rework it somehow ...

How about letting that patch do exactly what it says it does? Just move 
functions up in the file if you need them there, without changing them, 
and only change them when it's needed?

Thanks
Guennadi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/