Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751880AbbFVOMZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:12:25 -0400 Received: from ns.horizon.com ([71.41.210.147]:54018 "HELO ns.horizon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750954AbbFVOMS (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:12:18 -0400 Date: 22 Jun 2015 10:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20150622141216.7908.qmail@ns.horizon.com> From: "George Spelvin" To: adrian.hunter@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86, tsc: Allow for high latency in quick_pit_calibrate() Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ak@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@horizon.com, luto@amacapital.net, mingo@kernel.org, penberg@iki.fi, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5587EFC5.5010303@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 571 Lines: 14 Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 03/06/15 19:23, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> I'm certainly happy to apply this one. > > George Spelvin began investigating improving quick_pit_calibrate() but Ingo > anyway suggested this patch as the first, so can this be applied? Acked-by: George Spelvin It's currently the first patch in the series I'm developing, but if someone wants to beat me to it, no objection. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/