Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753369AbbFVVtG (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:49:06 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:33499 "EHLO mail-oi0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751507AbbFVVsx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:48:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [73.143.245.155] In-Reply-To: <9305.1434966107@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <6033.1434651905@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <9833421.4OAA7AQtgN@sifl> <9305.1434966107@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:48:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Create a common helper to determine an inode label [ver #3] From: Paul Moore To: David Howells Cc: Stephen Smalley , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, SELinux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 656 Lines: 18 On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:41 AM, David Howells wrote: > Paul Moore wrote: > >> This patch looks fine to me and I think there is an advantage to merging this >> regardless of what happens with the "unioning" work so I'm inclined to queue >> this up now unless you would prefer to resubmit with the union patches? > > If you could queue it up now, that'd be great! All set. As soon as the merge window closes I'll push it to the selinux#next branch. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/