Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753602AbbFWAY5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:24:57 -0400 Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:55701 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751731AbbFWAYt (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:24:49 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-80-5588a74e4fd5 Message-id: <5588A748.2070407@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:24:40 +0900 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Michael Turquette , Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "'Lukasz Majewski'" , "'Heiko Stuebner'" , "'Kevin Hilman'" , "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" , "'Sachin Kamat'" , "'Viresh Kumar'" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "'Tomasz Figa'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Chanwoo Choi'" , "'Thomas Abraham'" , "'Sylwester Nawrocki'" , "'Andreas Faerber'" , "'Doug Anderson'" , "'Javier Martinez Canillas'" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dts: Exynos4210: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property References: <'@samsung.com> <1428079429-4252-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1428079429-4252-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <00f801d0ac8c$344dfeb0$9ce9fc10$@kernel.org> <558767FC.4090405@samsung.com> <011f01d0ac8d$40a25110$c1e6f330$@kernel.org> <20150622150421.9112.96812@quantum> <55889E59.1070001@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <55889E59.1070001@samsung.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7p+yztCDWZ0c1k0byq22DhjPavF 9S/PWS3OLjvIZvH/0WtWi6O/CyxevzC06H/8mtni6+EVjBZvHm5mtNj0+BqrxeVdc9gsPvce YbSYcX4fk8XFU64Wh9+0s1qc/NPLaNGxjNFi1a4/jBYbv3o4iHi8v9HK7jG74SKLx9/n11k8 ds66y+6xaVUnm8eda3vYPDYvqffo27KK0WP7tXnMHptPV3t83iQXwB3FZZOSmpNZllqkb5fA ldH5chprwUrRii1nL7I0MH4W7GLk5JAQMJFoXLyFCcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAUkaJSwd3s0M4 Txkltk84D1bFK6AlsX7+GmYQm0VAVaL1zQtGEJtNwFhi8/IlbCC2qECExNvLJ6HqBSV+TL7H AmKLCPhJbN/7A2wDs8BFVon2J1PABgkLREkcOnwGattzZom+f+1ACQ4OTgFtiS/3dEFMZgF1 iSlTckHKmQXkJTavecs8gVFgFpIVsxCqZiGpWsDIvIpRNLU0uaA4KT3XSK84Mbe4NC9dLzk/ dxMjJCa/7mBceszqEKMAB6MSD2/B5I5QIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8U+cAhXhTEiurUovy44tK c1KLDzFKc7AoifPO3PU+REggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cDYpHH4yY2HLutNVMNPPYxak89s cuRlztV1Esu2idRu9pWudTx2wnv3L74yzQUbHaJqMvSPSIkzb3iaPX3boeUqGYosTidtN+/d 3P1k5ZHiOwGSax/+0Wh/9TlzQ6vHYVZp5RS7kqU5LJG+SbcWtby++8sklvXqOWtJt74tC3iT czaHdj2afeOwEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAPuvwOMUCAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2789 Lines: 70 On 23.06.2015 08:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23.06.2015 00:04, Michael Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2015-06-21 18:46:26) >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> >>>> On 22.06.2015 10:38, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> 2015-05-08 9:18 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski : >>>>>>> 2015-04-04 1:43 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz : >>>>>>>> From: Thomas Abraham >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For Exynos4210 platforms, add CPU operating points and CPU >>>>>>>> regulator supply properties for migrating from Exynos specific >>>>>>>> cpufreq driver to using generic cpufreq driver. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Changes by Bartlomiej: >>>>>>>> - removed Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 support for now >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim >>>>>>>> Cc: Doug Anderson >>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas >>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Faerber >>>>>>>> Cc: Sachin Kamat >>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Farber >>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>>>> >>>>>> Rebased and applied to my tree, I'll sent it later to Kukjin unless he >>>>>> picks it by himself from LKML. >>>>>> >>>>> Hi, as far as I know, this is for v4.2 not v4.1 so it will be applied based on >>>>> v4.2-rc1 after v4.2-rc1 release. >>>> >>>> You mean it is for v4.3, not v4.2? >>>> >>> Oops, yes v4.3. >>> >>> Thanks for the correction. >> >> Kukjin & Krzysztof, >> >> I'm confused on this point. I was planning to take patches 1, 2, 3, 5 >> and 6 towards 4.2 (e.g. in the pull request that I'll send out this >> week). >> >> Is patch 4 going out for 4.2 or 4.3? > > It is quite late for sending pull request to arm-soc for 4.2. > For example SoCFPGA pull request from last week was rejected: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/417980 Oh, that was wrong link. Here it is: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg425911.html > If you want to take it for 4.2 then I am fine with it but this will > cause some easy but annoying conflicts. There aren't difficult - just > most of nodes in board DTS changed their place. > > Example of resolution (target file after merge, with cpu nodes reordered > alphabetically): > https://github.com/krzk/linux/commit/2cec3cb48abaf44848c62f1c0836b772eb4680dd Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/