Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932079AbbFWHWs (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:22:48 -0400 Received: from mail-vn0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:32995 "EHLO mail-vn0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750926AbbFWHWl (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:22:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150623064140.GA18300@kroah.com> References: <20150623064140.GA18300@kroah.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:22:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: kdbus: to merge or not to merge? From: Richard Weinberger To: Greg KH Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni , Havoc Pennington , "Eric W. Biederman" , One Thousand Gnomes , Tom Gundersen , Daniel Mack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1736 Lines: 38 On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Greg KH wrote: >> The current state of uncertainty is problematic, I think. The kdbus >> team is spending a lot of time making things compatible with kdbus, >> and the latest systemd release makes kdbus userspace support >> mandatory. > > I stopped here in this email, as this is just flat out totally wrong, > and I don't want to waste my time trying to refute other totally wrong > statements as that would just somehow give them some validation that > they could possibly be correct. For the guys who not follow systemd development, this is the announcement in question: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June/033170.html * kdbus support is no longer compile-time optional. It is now always built-in. However, it can still be disabled at runtime using the kdbus=0 kernel command line setting, and that setting may be changed to default to off, by specifying --disable-kdbus at build-time. Note though that the kernel command line setting has no effect if the kdbus.ko kernel module is not installed, in which case kdbus is (obviously) also disabled. We encourage all downstream distributions to begin testing kdbus by adding it to the kernel images in the development distributions, and leaving kdbus support in systemd enabled. Now kdbus is opt-out instead of opt-in. Although I didn't test it so far, systemd should work just fine if kdbus is not present as it can fall back to dbus. -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/