Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:30:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        ajitpal.singh@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq
 implementation
Message-ID: <20150623090016.GL16776@linux>
References: <1434987837-24212-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <1434987837-24212-9-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <20150623023458.GC16776@linux>
 <20150623070651.GA3245@x1>
 <20150623075509.GF16776@linux>
 <20150623083856.GH3245@x1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150623083856.GH3245@x1>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 834
Lines: 33

On 23-06-15, 09:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> Do you always write your documentation before implementing a
> feature?
> 
> Surely it goes;
>   Requirements Gathering
>   Plan and Prepare
>   Implement
>   Test
>   Document
>   Deliver
> 
> ;)

DT bindings aren't just simple documentation of how things are
working. I do things in the way you wrote earlier though :)

> That's not what it looks like to me:
> 
> git grep -C20 "compatible.*cpufreq" -- arch

Yeah, that's wrong. They got in much earlier and the bindings weren't
well thought through.

But they are discouraged today ..

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/